Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.ayliea.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
SPD-5 — Cybersecurity Principles for Space Systems
Space Policy Directive 5 (SPD-5) is the U.S. policy directive establishing cybersecurity principles for space systems. It applies to organizations that build, operate, or support space vehicles, ground systems, and command-and-telemetry networks — defense, commercial, and civil space operators alike. SPD-5 is the right assessment when your organization owns or operates space-segment infrastructure: satellite mission operations centers, payload command and control, telemetry processing, ground stations, or supplier programs supporting those operations.SPD-5 is a policy directive, not a regulation — but for U.S. government contractors and prime suppliers it functions as a baseline expectation. Civil and commercial operators increasingly adopt SPD-5 alignment voluntarily as a maturity signal to customers and underwriters.
What this framework covers
The assessment is structured around the five SPD-5 principles. Each principle maps to multiple operational and engineering controls.Risk-Based Cybersecurity Engineering
Risk-Based Cybersecurity Engineering
Development and operation of space systems using risk-based, cybersecurity-informed engineering with continuous monitoring, adaptation, and active configuration management.
Cybersecurity Plans & Protections
Cybersecurity Plans & Protections
Cybersecurity plans ensuring positive control of space vehicles, integrity of critical functions, and protections against unauthorized access, jamming, spoofing, ground system threats, and supply chain risks.
Best Practices & Threat Information Sharing
Best Practices & Threat Information Sharing
Adoption of established and evolving best practices and information-sharing arrangements that improve sector cybersecurity posture.
Government Roles & Responsibilities
Government Roles & Responsibilities
Allocation of cybersecurity responsibilities across program leadership, mission assurance, and operations — the “who owns what” question for space-segment cyber.
Implementation Authorities & Reporting
Implementation Authorities & Reporting
Why this matters for customers
Space systems carry cybersecurity risks the IT-centric frameworks don’t address well: jamming, spoofing, telemetry integrity, command authentication, and the supply-chain exposure that comes from low-volume specialized vendors. SPD-5 codifies those concerns into a policy-aligned posture target. This assessment surfaces:- Whether your space-system design lifecycle bakes cybersecurity in from requirements (vs. layering it on at integration)
- Whether positive-control mechanisms (command authentication, anti-jamming, anti-spoofing) are implemented and tested
- Whether your ground systems and supplier relationships are governed against known threat vectors
- Whether your reporting and information-sharing posture meets the policy-aligned baseline
How it relates to other frameworks
SPD-5 is the policy-level directive. Pair it with these for the engineering and operations specifics:- NIST IR 8401 — satellite ground segment cybersecurity (the implementation companion)
- NIST SP 800-53 — federal control catalog including SC, CM, AC, IR family controls referenced by space programs
- NIST CSF 2.0 — the framework structure SPD-5 implementations typically use to organize their program

